SquarePeg
Reged: Nov 09 2008
Posts: 48
|
|
Ok, here’s what I think. It’s long, so grab a cuppa.
Tavern denizens all have culpability in the current situation. Each and every one of us…to varying degrees. We crossed many lines. It’s been going on for years. Those who crossed are responsible. Those who encouraged and egged on are responsible. Those who banded together in complaining squads are responsible. Those who watched and said nothing are responsible. Those who saw real offenses and did nothing to right them are responsible. Those who frequented this establishment and made no attempt to meet the proprietors (mods). We shat in the sandbox. And most everybody got tossed out, even the sweet ones and the innocent.
Now, more than ever, our sandbox is in very real danger of being shut down.
What course of action we take depends on what we really want. I, for one, want to play in the sandbox again. But the real goal is to keep the community together.
We have to ask ourselves how we can get what we want? My experience is that you get what you want by 1) giving the other guy what he wants to some degree and 2) avoiding leaving them with buyers remorse.
We have no power to affect change unless it’s positive change. Boycotting will have zero effect and 1) may not even be noticed and 2) gives TBTB what they want (peace in the tavern) but does not gain the community anything. Any course of action needs to remove the feeling on the part of the mods that the effort of the tavern is a “thankless task”.
In their face just gives them permission to do what they really want to do – make the tavern go away. And let me tell ya, it’s easy – one click and the entire folder is hidden. Gone forevermore, along with all our history and all our posts. Getting revenge doesn’t reach the goal of getting my sandbox back. And while there may be satisfaction in telling them to stuff it, it’s a “cut off your nose to spite your face” thing.
What I propose is that we organize this here community and take it back. The goal is to remove the burr from under the saddle of TPTB and to never come to their attention again. Ever.
I suspect that the basic problem for Taunton is Value Proposition. The Tavern’s value is far outweighed by it’s cost: time, aggravation, risk to the Taunton brand – in their opinion. Why that is not true for Cook’s Talk, I have no idea. The only choices are 1) cost them less 2) be of more value or 3) a little bit of both. I suspect that the problem isn’t actually that tavern denizens don’t contribute enough to the taunton brand, it’s that it’s not recognized and that can be solved by familiarity and communication – two things sorely lacking in the relationship.
Don’t run to a new board, lessons don’t get learned that way. We’ll just shit in that sandbox, too. I’ve been through this cycle too many times. The new board will thrive for a little bit, fuelled by anger and “unfaired upon” but eventually it will wane and the community will fizzle out. New posters don’t come on board and eventually it becomes stale and people drop away. I’ve started two “refugee” boards from similar situations. It’s so satisfying at first, but in the final analysis, everyone misses the old sandbox, because the new one ain’t the same. The time, energy and money that it takes to support a thriving forum eventually wears ya down.
Our goal is to 1) get the sandbox back – with real usernames. Some are real baddies may not be let back in, but several were whacked unfairly and they should be reinstated.
But I want the sandbox back with rules posted and enforced. And consistent. Living with this frustrated gavel is no good. The problem is the rules shift around and then enforcement is completely absent. As we saw recently, frustration builds and then the mods go wild. Yes, that’s their fault and they did it badly. It’s not our fault that they don’t have the will or time to do this job. But barring the ability to change that (nil) the best plan I see is to share doing their job for them.
Here’s one way to go about it. My vote would be a well-executed, strategic plan:
1) Decide as a group to write one (1) single letter to Jean Paul/Robyn and post it on board. Like in the “Tavern Civility Pact” everyone shows their support by posting a single posts that says “AYE”. 2) Ask JP to “out” the current shadow mods and give them gavels. I guarandamntee you that JP isn’t sitting up 17 hours a day moving posts to the tavern, deleting posts etc. I posted a thread by accident in the wrong folder. It was moved in minutes to the Tavern. No way was Robyn and JP sitting on the board at the time (I looked at logins). Someone is modding, or several someones. Who are they? I bet they are “of us” but only have partial power. If they were fully empowered, no innocents would have been killed here. I say empower them fully. Hell, pay them if you have to. They are probably volunteers Out them and then we all respect them. No pushing, no shoving, no baiting. They are MODS. Period. Hopefully one or more of them turns out to be well-respected members of the community and can command the power and fairness needed. If not, choke it until we can lobby for more or different boards mods. 3) Realize we have no power to remove TBTB and attempts to do so will just get the board shut down. Robyn and JP aren’t going anywhere. They, or someone above them has a beef with the tavern – realize that and don’t tempt them. Why is GAY banned on BT, but not on CT. Why is CT as rough (and as political) or worse than BT, but all the attention is on BT? My suspicion is that there is backstory here that we don’t know. Therefore, recognize that it’s there (whatever it is) and deal with it. 4) Elect representatives to open up lines of communication with the MODS. These should be persuasive and effective communicators. No threats, no strident stuff – clear on mission and able to persuade. 5) Elect representatives to commit to act as “team mods”, official or unofficial, it doesn’t matter. It doesn’t matter what their background is or what their politics are: they need to be fair, even handed, even tempered and able to commit the time. If they don’t have the time, get more people to spread the burden. They are crew bosses and their word goes. When they say cut it out, that’s it, cut it out. If you don’t you go to the point system (see below) 6) Craft “rules to live by” and then live by them 7) Commit to self-moderation. When someone is baiting and rude and condescending and looking for a fight, we step and say so on board. 8) Craft a point system (which taunton should have already had) laying out how people should be bozoed, given time outs and permanently banned 9) Craft letters for the mods to use (which taunton should have already) along with a communication plan for sending them out to defenders. 10) Commit to never again email Robyn or JP with complaints. That what got us here in the first place. Don’t complain on board or off – only reports to the Board Mods. 11) Give up on the idea that topics of discussion are inherently bad. Complaining about “polijive” isn’t really helpful. However, agree to constrain the politics to a few threads. Don’t post every bit of political news in a new thread. That will allow people who don’t want to play to avoid the topic easier. 12) Give up on the idea that the tavern can only be frequented by people who can prove their construction background. It’s alienating and folks from all walks of life have something to add. 13) Decide whether you want transparency in mod action – do you want a thread where the mods pop in to say: just a note to let you know Larry’s been banned. Or would you rather not know on board? Either way is fine, but it needs to be consistent. 14) Commit to support the mods when they make decisions (assuming we all are on board with fair rules and a even handed system for penalties). If we do this right the official mods take big actions ONLY after discussion with the Team Mods/Crew Bosses. No controversy needed. No infighting: “ I can’t believe you banned him, he’s much wors than”…..no buts.
I bet if we step up and present as an organized community, we’ll get it back and if we show our mettle, we might even be trusted with words like “gay” and “crap” again. =)
In lieu of all of the above, I would vote for “cooling off”. I got a 10 dollar bill that says the majority will be reinstated soon anyway.
However, Cooling Off doesn’t give the TPTB comfort that we will play right and it doesn’t shift any of the power our way – which is one of the problems here is that the community as no power. Taunton isn’t going to miss our 150 or 200 subscriptions. Trust me, if we all disappear, others will take our place and the only ones hurt are us.
I value the community and want to find the best way to get us what we want, get Taunton what they want. If we do that – the community stays together.
My two cents, for what it’s worth.
Christi SquarePeg
|
ANDYBUILDZ
Reged: Jul 19 2002
Posts: 25
Loc: COLD SPRING HARBOR, LONG ISLAN...
|
|
Nice post SP...really well thought out!!..
Like I said in a previous post having members on "the board of Mods" or whatever you want to call them would be a way to help BT stay on a positive course and lighten their...and our load. The example I used was The Forestry Forum.
They have a folder called: ABOUT THIS FORUM and within that there's -->"Behind The Forum".
I think something along those lines would be invaluable except in BT it would be more about whats going on behind the scenes to keep things running smoothly and fairly for all.
http://www.forestryforum.com/board/index.php#4
-------------------- www.CLIFFORDRENOVATIONS.COM
Edited by ANDYBUILDZ (Sun Nov 09 2008 06:43 PM)
|
Heck
Reged: Nov 15 2004
Posts: 164
Loc: La La Land
|
|
A good, well reasoned post, SP, with constructive ideas. It's apparent you have been through this before.
It's been obvious to me for some time that some one up high has a personal agenda with the community at BT, due to the disparate treatment afforded to BT vs CT. It seems to be a person with a very narrow mind who wants to tell us adults how to think, what to say, and what to believe. They purport to confine the language not to just that which would be admissable on a family forum, but attempt to ban the use of commonly used words that are hot buttons to them All of this with no explanations whatsoever, as if we were all small children.
It is this utter unfairness that galls so much, and makes it difficult for many who want to go back to make gestures of reconciliation.
I agree with many of the proposals you put forth in your post, but a real solution will involve both sides placing their cards on the table.
|
SquarePeg
Reged: Nov 09 2008
Posts: 48
|
|
I do think it's possible to open up a dialog.
And I think we should try.
|
SquarePeg
Reged: Nov 09 2008
Posts: 48
|
|
We've always used a "forum administration" folder that is hidden to discuss cooperative managment. Also a "forum" folder out front for members to post in.
Works well.
|
TGNY
Reged: Jan 20 2007
Posts: 18
Loc: NYC
|
|
If nothing else Cal, this little BT police action is great for business over here. I see people reading up on some of the old posts like 'chocolate mousse'. Maybe you should start charging a cover.. and you can hire those waitresses from the Star Diner.
|
SquarePeg
Reged: Nov 09 2008
Posts: 48
|
|
I could be completely wrong on some of my thinking -- without real "inside knowledge" I'm just guessing. But, I've been around internet communities and how they work long enough to see the dynamics are really the same wherever you go. As far as current thinking from TPTB, we can't know unless they talk to us.
|
Heck
Reged: Nov 15 2004
Posts: 164
Loc: La La Land
|
|
The same thing that happened to the mag is happening to the forum.
The mag has been dumbed down, I dropped my subscription years ago, it was no longer of any use or interest to the pros.
They have been attempting to do the same thing to the forum. And, if that is what they want, that is inevitably what will happen.
No amount of complaint or pleading was able to save the magazine.
I understand that many of the patrons were too loud and unruly, especially as the place was being transformed into a fern bar, so they took action.
But to me it's indicative of the direction they are wanting to go.
|
JHOLE
Reged: Nov 08 2008
Posts: 258
Loc: Oregon. Ohio
|
|
Not sayin' we shouldn't, but...
Up to this point, anyone with enough gall to even ask a question or post a concern has recieved a speedy and thorough beat down, delete or bounce.
I don't necessarily disagree with your first post, but(again), it sure seems like a lot of BS to just sit down, drink a beer, and exercise the first amendment. In the end it still places a bunch of responsible adults into a daycare atmosphere.
As an example - One of my last conversations in the Tav was with you (COLB). To be short, through the middle of that exchange, it did get a little heated. Trying to get a point across to someone who isn't following your points is very frustrating. In the end though, you and I, and the people following it came to the realisation that it was more of a misunderstanding of initial premise than argument. In the end I felt no harm was done and no hard feelings were had. Unfortunately I feel someone saw the middle of that exchange, didn't follow it to it's conclusion, and blasted me out. If they would have seen the progression to the end they would have seen that it turned out to be a positive for all involved.
If the content and exchanges aren't allowed to happen freely (within reason of course) what's the point? And I have a feeling that TPTB at Taunton are not interested in the free flow in the Tavern type topics.
I feel that there should be less restriction and a better definition of the ones that remain, than more.
But, I aint holdin' out hope that Taunton really give a dropping.
I don't have ALL the answers...just along for the ride for now...
Just .02
--------------------
|
SquarePeg
Reged: Nov 09 2008
Posts: 48
|
|
I understand your frustration.
But I really think that if we are to move this situation forward, we have to let the hurts go.
We can hash out the injustice later, ya know?
I'm a fixer and it just kills me to not DO something.
|
JHOLE
Reged: Nov 08 2008
Posts: 258
Loc: Oregon. Ohio
|
|
I agree, I'm more of a fixer than you would think.
Win -win is always the best. Just don't know what their intentions are at this point. 
If they'd rather be done with the Tav, then fine. 
They don't have to run it anymore, and we don't need to be worried about our BT access being tied to it.Or their skiddishness in running it.
That would give them no reason not to reestablish the people that they wrongly booted from BT because of Tav issues and everyone moves on together with what they are interested in most.
Not lobbying.. Just throwin' it out there.
--------------------
|
PlumbBill
Reged: Nov 09 2008
Posts: 22
Loc: Tacoma Wa
|
|
OK I'm here.
So I sent a former employee that letter to post. I did get a kick out of the name he chose. Thanks for all the replies that i got, I will answer everyone.
NOW WTF??????????
He Emailed me this morning says he can't find the post that he made "message does not exist".
Now I was effun tame with that letter, & blamed nobody but myself.
Saying goodbye is against BT rules. Holy crap.
|
Boss_Hog
Reged: Mar 24 2005
Posts: 76
Loc: Carlinville, Illinois
|
|
SquarePeg, I didn't read all of your long post - It was just too much.
At the moment I'd say I'm too ticked off to go kiss their butts and ask to be let back in. If someone else feels like that's a good idea, more power to them.
-------------------- .
|
PIFFIN
Reged: Apr 29 2002
Posts: 94
Loc: Island in Maine
|
|
Becoming an unperson is hard
-------------------- .
Excellence is its own reward!
|
MikeSmith
Reged: Apr 29 2002
Posts: 970
Loc: Rhode Island
|
|
well.... i'm very goal oriented in my business , political, family, and personal life...
when a dispute arises, i always try to get the parties to focus on their mutual goal... they usually have one
then they have to modify their position enough to allow the other party some breathing room so they too can focus on the goal
here's my goal.... to continue to enjoy the conversation with my friends and acquaintances on BT... that includes all of the different categories....including the Tavern
here at QT there is not enough new blood to sustain my interest ... nor the interest of most
i can only participate meaningfully in one forum.. for me that is BT i'm not interested in a boycott.. i think it would be counterproductive... it would not move us towards the goal... what is the goal ? 1)to reinstate some of my old friends and adversaries in the Tavern 2)to help them tone down the vitriol so we don't have to resort to insults to each other 3)every once in a while.. someone wanders in and starts kicking over the furniture... acting like TROLLS.. they are fairly easy to spot.. i would like some way of letting them see the error of their ways 4) it doesn't bother me if Taunton uses censorship.. it's their board.... and i can certainly tell what XXX means from the context
5) i would like to STOP the reporting of perceived violations by some members they should learn to ignore them and move on
6) i would change MY stance and tell certain people that I feel they are overstepping the bounds of good taste and i hope they would take it in the spirit offered...i wouldn't do that on a regular basis....it loses it's effectiveness 7) i really miss some of the people who are no longer here... some have just wandered away... some were banned but some returned just to fan the political flames... we would have been better served if they had remained away
8) some of those who are banned are going to stay banned because they refuse to recognize that BT is not theirs to do with as they want..... i can think of one who fits that description and i really wish that person would make their peace with TPTB.... because i really value their input and conversation 9) BT is very much a part of my small life.. it is important to me.. the fests are important to me... meeting people in person that i have met here on BT is important to me.. i'm looking forward to next August and attending yet another fest and meeting some more new people 10) push and they'll push back...push harder and they'll push back harder first they'll get rid of the Tavern... then BT... they have other forums ... 11) one of the charms of BT is the constant inflow of new personalities..... it has acheived a "critical mass" and is self sustaining...... QT will never acheive that critical mass... it is a niche
enough for now...basically, i'm in agreement with Luka & Christi
|
PIFFIN
Reged: Apr 29 2002
Posts: 94
Loc: Island in Maine
|
|
"5) i would like to STOP the reporting of perceived violations by some members they should learn to ignore them and move on"
in my POV that seems to have been the fuse on this bomb. Yes there have been infractions, but crybabies made life hard for the mods.
I know I was toning down after a nudge and an elbow in the ribs from Square Peg. Carefully done, that sort of thing can help us help each other, coming from someone respected as long as worded right and not done too often.
I don't mean just her doing it. I mean each of us dope-slapping each other time to time. I think you have reminded me once or twice that the sun is shinning outdoors and what a nice day for a walk.
-------------------- .
Excellence is its own reward!
|
calvin
Reged: Apr 29 2002
Posts: 2363
Loc: NW Ohio
|
|
If nothing else Cal, this little BT police action is great for business over here. I see people reading up on some of the old posts like 'chocolate mousse'. Maybe you should start charging a cover.. and you can hire those waitresses from the Star Diner.
Hey man.
We know our place here.
Keep this board up so in times like these there's an outlet available for communication.
Keep it up so as in the past when BT crapped out and was unavailable we could at least find some info on the reason.
Keep it up to make collections possible to help out one of our friends when they're in need.
The few of us trying to maintain it might be viewed as Viagra I guess. 
In the beginning here there might have been fleeting thoughts of actually replacing Breaktime-tho I don't think any of us thought that remotely possible, probable or even viable. We remain online as a safety valve, a sort of lifeline-backup-whatever. To do that does cost money. We cut everything. Hurt some people in the process. I know for me, p'ing money away isn't an enjoyable passtime.
We've cut costs down to as close to zero as possible. Gave up on Auctions when we couldn't con anymore folks out of goods to put up for bid. Still, you have it right-it'd be nice to get a donation once in a while. With this exposure-maybe we will.
I guess you can be assured unless this thing crashes and burns it'll be around the next time you need a hand.
-------------------- Remodeling Contractor just outside the Glass City
|
brownbagg
Reged: Nov 09 2008
Posts: 13
|
|
only thing that ever offended me was when bob started preaching the religion with verses and started preaching about abortion. Subject that I feel should not be ram down your throat.
|
Eric_Paulson
Reged: Feb 12 2007
Posts: 32
|
|
"when a dispute arises, i always try to get the parties to focus on their mutual goal... they usually have one
then they have to modify their position enough to allow the other party some breathing room so they too can focus on the goal"
Mike,
I've been taking a back seat watch on this whole episode, as I have not been banned. (Don't know how they missed me!)
So far from what I have read here, I agree with your ideas and Brians post.
Others have made suggestions, but based on FAR too many assumptions, mostly the erroneous one the Taunton will ever WANT them to return to BT.
It's a sad time for BT, but I think what happened was for the most part justifiable. And they DON"T (repaet several times) have to justify their actions, nor do they need to let ANYONE back in.
I am amazed to sit here and watch folks that got tossed, try to bully their way back in, and not even realize what they are suggesting.
There are a few folks in the Tavern that I could admittedly do with out, but I would still miss them to some extent because they are not always total azzes.
Just my 2 cents here.
Eric Paulson
|
ANDYBUILDZ
Reged: Jul 19 2002
Posts: 25
Loc: COLD SPRING HARBOR, LONG ISLAN...
|
|
Quote:
"5) i would like to STOP the reporting of perceived violations by some members they should learn to ignore them and move on"
in my POV that seems to have been the fuse on this bomb. Yes there have been infractions, but crybabies made life hard for the mods.
EXACTLY my thoughts all along!!...not that it matters anymore. I even recieved private emails telling me "to watch my back"....like it was some kind of game. I thought that was going on behind the scenes by a select few to only find out I was right. Looks like it blew up in their faces and took some of us along with them for the ride. I know there are a few that played that game still with partial privlidges posting in the General folders as unfair as that seems. Life's unfair ain't it?! It irks me to no end thinking about emails flying back and forth between those people plotting .....how they'd teach us.....by reporting us...for anything remotely worthy. They knew the mods were over their heads trying to figure out what was worthy and what wasn't so they just opened a mass boot store.
Reporting people seemed to me to be as lame as getting booted for little reason yet too many of the community couldn't help themselves. The ignore feature or scrolling past posts wasn't good enough.
Reporting people should be reserved for very serious issues like what Piff went through with Larry....not just b/c you find someone annoying.
Things become more and more clear don't they? Hindsites 20/20 ain't it?
-------------------- www.CLIFFORDRENOVATIONS.COM
Edited by ANDYBUILDZ (Sun Nov 09 2008 10:24 PM)
|